Material Security vs. Mimecast
Many email security tools only focus on stopping threats at the perimeter. Material Security provides deeper protection with a single platform that combines threat detection and response across email, files, and accounts.
Material Security is best for cloud-first organizations that want broad protection across email, files, and accounts in Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. Material is designed for companies that need:
- Protection before and after messages are delivered
- Resilient account controls like MFA step-up authentication for suspicious sessions
- One integrated console instead of managing a patchwork of point solutions
.png)
Mimecast is best for organizations standardized on a secure email gateway model and comfortable changing MX records, tuning quarantine flows, and focusing security efforts on pre-delivery filtering. Teams may prefer Mimecast’s approach if they have:
- On-prem email that requires a traditional gateway
- Established email-only security teams
- Dedicated operations personnel to maintain a gateway
Differentiators Between Material Security & Mimecast
Ease of Deployment
Material Security connects to Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 by API, and setup takes less than ten minutes to establish a secure, read-write connection to email and files.
Mimecast centers on a gateway architecture that has been adapted for the cloud. SEG implementation requires DNS changes, traffic rerouting, and ongoing maintenance.
Less Time to Manage
Material Security offers features designed to reduce admin overhead:
- No gateway, no shadow mail store, and no daily queue triage
- Single platform for phishing, posture, DLP, and incident response
- Messages aren’t detained by default, so deliverability stays clean
- Precise remediation rather than blunt quarantines
Mimecast workflows operate around a quarantine, which requires constant oversight:
- Queue review and end-user releases
- Policy tuning for false positives and graymail
- Deliverability disruptions when settings tighten
More Coverage at a Faction of the Cost
Material Security provides coverage that spans email, files, and accounts in Google and Microsoft, reducing the total cost of ownership versus Mimecast:
- Lower subscription vs. suite of point solutions
- Reduced person-hours required to maintain the platform
Mimecast’s strength is pre-delivery email security at the perimeter, leaving gaps in file and account security. There are limited options for post-delivery email remediation, leaving companies open to risk from account takeovers.
.png)
Why do security teams choose Material Security?
It’s simple: it provides protection beyond just email at a better value.
Email Security
Material runs on auto-pilot to remediate sophisticated email attacks that bypass traditional controls—without disrupting operations or wasting resources managing rulesets
File Security
Understand where sensitive data exists, if it is exposed, and reduce the risk. Material detects sensitive content in files and automatically remediates excessive permissions and inappropriate sharing.
Account Security
Detect account takeovers, contain their impact, and proactively harden your accounts. Material prevents attackers from establishing their presence, moving laterally, and exfiltrating sensitive data.
The most innovative organizations trust Material
%20(2).avif)